10-03-2010, 08:41 PM
(10-03-2010, 05:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: we have come to a good and important point i was wanting to vocalize.
I appreciate this, your post provides a great deal of clarity about where you are coming from. Thank you for the thorough explanation.
I agree that for everything other than Infinity, there is a limitation, some kind of constraint that distorts and puts a maximum on how much of the Creator is expressed. Thank you for putting that in such an easy to follow way.
I also agree that effective coordination and resource use will be important at higher levels of spiritual existence.
May I see if there's a revised definition which we might agree on.
The human version of 3D economics, is based on allocation of scare physical resources necessary for the basics of survival. Channeled information about 4D+ indicates that beyond the 3D Veil and Harvest, the basics of life survival will no longer be so scarce as to involve questions who gets to live and who must die; all premises based on not enough for everyone to exist and thrive will become irrelevant. 4D+ will involve a higher version of economics, based on coordinated activity to optimally express loving care and service.
The human version of 3D government, is based on a monopoly of force over a geographic territory. Channeled information about 4D+ indicates that beyond the Veil and Harvest, the use of force and the monopoly of demands will not be relevant concepts. Coordination will be on a voluntary, free will basis that is far beyond the limitations of our current experiences with politics.
We can expect that on complete entry into 4D, there will be a learning process. Capabilities and possibilities may be astronomically beyond what we are currently used to; however, there will still be a need for skillful personal action and for coordinated teamwork to make the most of the situation. The specifics of those lessons will change from 3D to 4D, but the need for those lessons and their importance continues.
If you'd agree with this view, then we are actually talking about the same thing. If you disagree, then we have different views about either 3D or 4D+. Finding out the nature of those views, so we can either reach a shared view or agree to disagree, might be productive. I'm certainly willing to keep working at this dialogue.