(10-05-2010, 04:31 PM)unity100 Wrote: only that, all the skills and specializations, will be equal, and their manifestors will have equal rights to whatever community creates, including their own creations. just like how in a group of people, maybe a tribe with no orange ray or yellow ray power and ownership distortions.
So are you saying that when one entity works towards getting harvested to the next density, they don't add any special abilities to themselves. It all belongs to the collective and the whole planet will harvest along with them. That does not make too much sense.
(10-05-2010, 04:31 PM)unity100 Wrote: wow. you even use 'of course'.
Of course I do
(10-05-2010, 04:31 PM)unity100 Wrote: noone 'owns' their body. its an attachment until a defined time, and that body is a part of the infinite intelligence manifesting in 1-2 d on this planet. you cannot 'own' any part of intelligent infinity. leave that aside, even that attachment can be shared, and is shared, as can be seen from channeling work and similar transient spiritual phenomenon.
Oh! I see. Now we are using a term called attachment instead of owning. What is the difference other than the word game? Same with ownership, you don't own things from eternity to eternity as life is fluid and changing all the time, you are only "attached" to them for a time being... There is no difference in using either word.
(10-05-2010, 04:31 PM)unity100 Wrote: that seems to be misinformation that says socialism means 'identical'.
no such thing exists. different skills and specializations coexist, cooperating. competing instead of cooperating. that is the logic of positive multi-beingness in the first place.
only that, all the skills and specializations, will be equal, and their manifestors will have equal rights to whatever community creates, including their own creations. just like how in a group of people, maybe a tribe with no orange ray or yellow ray power and ownership distortions.
somewhere in the same thread you were saying about wearing the same uniform (gosh that would look ugly, very military like don't you think) and now here you are suggesting it does not mean identical. Wearing the same uniform is very identical to me.
Again here you are saying all the skills will be equal. That is just the value system. You will consider them as equal. So a plumber would be considered equal to the painter. But that still implies different skill sets.
So is it identical or equal? Equal I can buy but identical like in the same uniform or everybody living in the same house or same height is not very ...unique like a snoflake is...