I think most people would be hard pressed to find any medium with 100% (hell even 75% accuracy). If there were, the scientific establishment would readily accept the existence of such phenomena as channeling, life after death, psychic abilities and so on. It would all be scientifically known, and accepted if one could produce a flawless accuracy rating in any given test of veridical perception. I think that channeling is often a lot like tuning into a really staticy and faint signal and that it is really easy to lose the signal. Why such distortion? I think it has to do with the "law of confusion" aka "law of free will" (maybe we should call it the "law of the veil"). To know with absolute surety these things in a mass sort of way would "infringe" upon the confusion of some living.
Having said that, is this medium even remotely accurate or worse, deliberately selling falsehoods? I would say the accuracy is relatively low (which is common) and that she is not deliberately making it up. This is just my opinion.
This is also why I have never been a big fan of conscious channeling. Too much distortion.
Having said that, is this medium even remotely accurate or worse, deliberately selling falsehoods? I would say the accuracy is relatively low (which is common) and that she is not deliberately making it up. This is just my opinion.
This is also why I have never been a big fan of conscious channeling. Too much distortion.