07-27-2016, 06:11 PM
Bring4th_GLB,
I think that last bullet point was really onto something.
I may be digressing from the OP's point, but how could Ra ever really use words to remove the veil from an entity, to have a third-density entity see the whole creation as "one"...which is what Ra sees?
Now oppositely, how could Ra give an answer within the perspective of a third density entity, a perspective which would be practical to Don? I believe the other posters' questions answered this, stating that there were limitations.
But...apart from not being simultaneously in and out of the veil, so as to provide practical answers for Don, Ra was simply answering the questions which were formulated verbally or in Don's mind. Without being in the veil and simultaneously out of it, how could Ra answer in total recognition of Don's understandings and seeking? Ra would have to have been walking in Don's third-density experience, I think, to give the most practical or relevant answers.
If not, then Ra would have to guess what it was like given all the resources it had; but mostly, Ra just grasped the questions which were asked and answered only those questions logically -- as far as I know, Ra was never answering a more subtle question, a less mentally articulated matter demanding clarity, or dormant matters that may have been lingering in Don's mind; but Ra had certainly been elaborating on a whole bunch of "what we've come to know in all of our experience in the creation..." stuff, and Ra also went back to clarify on some things it stated.
But what OP specifically states is that Ra likes to begin answering a simple question with a "from our point of view..." introduction, and THEN goes on to answer Don's questions. Which sounds silly on Ra's part.
I don't recall that sort of stuff from the Material, but since I'm already defending Ra: it's probably just a reminder that some things are relevant to seeking the Law of One while other things aren't; if not a reminder, then I think it's an unnecessary introduction.
OP, I'd like to see an example of what you're talking about.
I think that last bullet point was really onto something.
I may be digressing from the OP's point, but how could Ra ever really use words to remove the veil from an entity, to have a third-density entity see the whole creation as "one"...which is what Ra sees?
Now oppositely, how could Ra give an answer within the perspective of a third density entity, a perspective which would be practical to Don? I believe the other posters' questions answered this, stating that there were limitations.
But...apart from not being simultaneously in and out of the veil, so as to provide practical answers for Don, Ra was simply answering the questions which were formulated verbally or in Don's mind. Without being in the veil and simultaneously out of it, how could Ra answer in total recognition of Don's understandings and seeking? Ra would have to have been walking in Don's third-density experience, I think, to give the most practical or relevant answers.
If not, then Ra would have to guess what it was like given all the resources it had; but mostly, Ra just grasped the questions which were asked and answered only those questions logically -- as far as I know, Ra was never answering a more subtle question, a less mentally articulated matter demanding clarity, or dormant matters that may have been lingering in Don's mind; but Ra had certainly been elaborating on a whole bunch of "what we've come to know in all of our experience in the creation..." stuff, and Ra also went back to clarify on some things it stated.
But what OP specifically states is that Ra likes to begin answering a simple question with a "from our point of view..." introduction, and THEN goes on to answer Don's questions. Which sounds silly on Ra's part.
I don't recall that sort of stuff from the Material, but since I'm already defending Ra: it's probably just a reminder that some things are relevant to seeking the Law of One while other things aren't; if not a reminder, then I think it's an unnecessary introduction.
OP, I'd like to see an example of what you're talking about.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)