09-11-2016, 10:42 AM
The OP questions advertisement of the "wanderers" concept, asking if it would be an infringement of freewill to use the tool of mass media to do so. Once we polarize our actions themselves will advertise the Right Hand Path. Even this forum is advertised on the L/L Research website, so for members, the measure is of volume, not essence. Perhaps "service" itself has a natural element of infringement.
The calling responded to by The Confederation, was measured by a balance of values, namely: service versus non-infringement of freewill.
The question becomes one of how much polarity is lost versus how much will the effort actually serve those affected by the act. In the third dimension of self versus other, the direction in which we are moving is towards polarizing. This implies that helping people to polarize towards service to others is a useful effort.
The polarity of the "walk-in" who took Lincoln's place to command the Union Army, killing hundreds of thousands, "was somewhat, but not severely, lessened...", but it nevertheless was a great service to the people on the Earth.
There was no karma involved for the entity in this action, "...due to its detachment from any outcome. Its attitude throughout was one of service to others...".
For an adept who has worked throughout this major cycle to avoid gaining karma and clearing attachment, perhaps such an effort might not be necessary. However for a walk-in or a wanderer, perhaps from the fifth dimension, who has found his/herself in a position to provide the service that makes use of a certain louder voice to the world than the website of this forum, the question of value is: how much of an infringement is the revelation versus, whom might it serve. I think the way that this has been done before is with the use of the Question Mark (?).
Some guides for wanderers date back to the late 1800's. (Sons of the Law of One dotcom).
The calling responded to by The Confederation, was measured by a balance of values, namely: service versus non-infringement of freewill.
The question becomes one of how much polarity is lost versus how much will the effort actually serve those affected by the act. In the third dimension of self versus other, the direction in which we are moving is towards polarizing. This implies that helping people to polarize towards service to others is a useful effort.
The polarity of the "walk-in" who took Lincoln's place to command the Union Army, killing hundreds of thousands, "was somewhat, but not severely, lessened...", but it nevertheless was a great service to the people on the Earth.
There was no karma involved for the entity in this action, "...due to its detachment from any outcome. Its attitude throughout was one of service to others...".
For an adept who has worked throughout this major cycle to avoid gaining karma and clearing attachment, perhaps such an effort might not be necessary. However for a walk-in or a wanderer, perhaps from the fifth dimension, who has found his/herself in a position to provide the service that makes use of a certain louder voice to the world than the website of this forum, the question of value is: how much of an infringement is the revelation versus, whom might it serve. I think the way that this has been done before is with the use of the Question Mark (?).
Some guides for wanderers date back to the late 1800's. (Sons of the Law of One dotcom).
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)