Enoch's influence on the Jewish people as Metatron

[Aaron]

Highly disagree, but don't really have the time to go in to detail why. It's an interesting story you have created but there is some misunderstanding in my eyes. Samael is actually used both for a Qliphoth and for the Sephiroth Geburah (where Mathers changed it to Zamael to distinguish).

From chapter 14 of book 3, it would seem that S-dog and Z-dog are two different angels:

(4) These are the names of the rulers of the
world: Gabriel, the angel of the fire,
Baradiel, the angel of the hail, Ruchiel who
is appointed over the wind, Baraqiel who is
appointed over the lightnings,

Za'amiel who is appointed over the
vehemence,

Just two verses prior to that is the one about S-dog that I mentioned in the OP:

(2) Even Sammael, the Prince of the
Accusers, who is greater than all the princes
of kingdoms on high; feared and trembled
before me.

What  I'm wondering now, is if Za'amiel is the same as the Zamael you mention. Are they two different social memory complexes or members of the same one? Is one positive and the other negative? It seems we can't know for sure.


What's the Sephirot Geburah? Can you help me clear up my misunderstanding? I honestly have not had a chance to study the Sephirot. All I can gather from Ra's one mention of the "Geburah" phrase is that it invokes the higher density entity Michael that is related to Mars.

(74.4)Let us observe the entity as it is in relationship to the archetypical mind. You may consider the possibilities of utilizing the correspondences between the mind/body/spirit in microcosm and the archetypical mind/body/spirit closely approaching the Creator. For instance, in your ritual performed to purify this place you use the term “Ve Geburah.” It is a correct assumption that this is a portion or aspect of the One Infinite Creator. However, there are various correspondences with the archetypical mind which may be more and more refined by the adept. “Ve Geburah” is the correspondence of Michael, of Mars, of the positive, of maleness. “Ve Gedulah” has correspondences to Jupiter, to femaleness, to the negative, to that portion of the Tree of Life concerned with Auriel.

I am not at all familiar with this Ahayana Deane but it seems much of your idea here is based on her impressions. After looking her up a bit I don't get a good first impression. Her energy is 'bright' but feels very cold and sort of hollow to me. Will have to see more about her ideas.

Not quite. I'm not basing my theory off her ideas. I'm making a connection between an ancient book and what she said in a youtube video 9 years ago. Now I'm not gonna go and defend her stuff because I've only watched a couple videos and skimmed through one of her books at this point, leaving me a little on the fence myself. But basically the situation is that she and her group have been channeling the "Guardians" (which is a different group from the Council of 9 of Saturn) since before Don, Carla, and Jim channeled the Ra Material. (Here's proof of their difference from 24.4: "It was clear to not only us but also to the Council and the Guardians that our methods were not appropriate for this particular sphere.") A lot of what she says lines up with the Law of One Material, actually. And it just gives a much, much deeper scope of view to the entire situation we find ourselves embroiled in. The sheer magnitude of the information she provides lends itself to be a 7th density or higher source just by that virtue alone.


But anyway, she calls it "death star merkahbah" because she claims there was a satelite/craft of sorts above Atlantis that was controlled by the Sons of Belial, and which was powered by an artificially created merkahbah field. All it means is that it's not a natural merkahbah created by the activation of the green ray which increases the spinning of the two tetrahedrons of an entity, or a group of entities', energy body/bodies to a baseline frequency which activates the merkahbah. Instead it is a merkahbah which operates without green ray. Standard STS. They rely on technology.


Now since we know that the wars with crystal beam weapons happened in Atlantis 11,000 years ago, and this whole Orion Jehovah group business of taking Yahweh's name and manipulating the Jews on their way out of Egypt thing happened only 3,300 years ago (www.lawofone.info/timeline.php), then it's reasonably logical to deduce that whatever artificial merkahbah technology Orion was using with the Ark of the Covenant of Yahweh was based on the Atlantean death star merkahbah technology. It just makes sense.

To clarify, I disagree with the notion that Enoch was a negative entity working for Orion. I do agree with the fact of early negative influence and it is true in my understanding that there was a corrupt Merkaba, it just wasn't Enoch who made it negative. It was technology that he did work on and which was then 'taken over' by the 'Cabal' that wanted control over Atlantis. It wasn't intended to be negative but was twisted by the Sons of Belial.

[font=Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Well yes, Enoch did not make it negative. He was shown it, and indeed given dominion over it, by way of receiving a mark on his forehead from "the Holy One" (who I am more and more inclined to believe is actually Lucifer) when he ascended after 365 years of life. This "Holy One" actually gives him the title of "The Lesser Yahweh". It's pure sinister stuff. And it's stuff we know that STO entities would NEVER do. It's simply written there in the book, plain as day. All I'm doing here is providing an exegenesis of the text of the book using the framework of understanding provided by the Law of One Material, because this framework is necessary in order to truly understand the text. When looking at this text critically in light of what we know from LOO, it becomes a clear picture of a negative adept ascending, being assigned a spot in the 4D- heirarchy by Lucifer, and then working with Orion on their attempt to manipulate the Jews.[/font]

There are a lot of convoluted ideas here, I'm not sure where to start picking them apart. I will say that I did have some similar suspicions myself at one point but have since dispelled them.

What I do believe is there has been a large case of identity thefts on this planet which makes discerning the truth through names exceedingly difficult.

Why assume there has only ever been one Enoch? That name or Metatron could also have been usurped by negative entities.

[font=Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]I'm open to everything you have to say. I am approaching this in a purely scholarly fashion. I'm not trying to sway anyone's opinion. And I do agree with you that names are being stolen all over the place, and that there are multiple occurrences and outcroppings of every entity. It is necessary to sort through all this carefully. That's why we have to reflect what we know off of eachother like this, in order to come to a balanced understanding.[/font]


As I said, I just critically examine this text with the framework of understanding provided by LOO. And when one does so, the concepts form a coherent picture that not only fits in with earth history, but also with what some positive wanderers are saying on this planet today. Because of this validation, I'm inclined to think that this is one piece of the puzzle out of thousands that can help us make sense of the events that are unfolding in our lifetimes during this Grand Harvest. Because there are going to be tricks, and tricksters. All of these demons and angels in the Bible,[font=Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] all these entities from throughout ancient history, which we have a deeper understanding of thanks to LOO Material, they are all immortal, alive, and acting upon Gaia at this very second. Thus, it is wise to know about them.[/font]