11-08-2010, 04:55 PM
(11-08-2010, 12:07 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: It's probably better that way, that we can't link any color/race/body with any planetary race. There is enough racism already without adding to it, the destructions of planets, etc. Just as white Americans don't want to be blamed for what our ancestors did (genocide of Natives, slavery of Africans, etc.), neither do we want to blame the descendants of those planets for what their ancestors did.
in this case, they are not descendants, however. they are the very souls incarnated in mars during that stage.
(11-08-2010, 02:31 PM)rilesywilesy Wrote: I'm not saying it's important, but there are fairly clear racial boundaries still to this day. Maybe it's better to think the way you're saying though, to avoid racism. I'm just curious. Maybe it's nothing.
ra uses the word 'planetary influence'. this phrase is more than just using bodies for incarnation.
im under the impression that, the incarnated entities still hold a connection to their original logos, or, they still maintain the particular spiritual and subconscious (mental) biases they have amassed in their original logoi. any entity from another logos incarnating into the influence of another group, would probably be taking on a lot of the influences of that culture for that time period. (societal mind).
so, we have different cultures, some very clearly defined.