04-25-2017, 01:40 PM
Totally agree, but most people forget that for attraction to exist, repulsion must as well.
Metaphysically, sexy is subjective.
What is repulsive to one man another finds attractive.
Sort of like one man's trash is another man's treasure.
So unattractive people and attractive people both are one another with certain types of people seeing those traits of that person as either attractive or not regardless of what any one labeler (like myself) says.
Yet there seems to be some consensus of what is prominently aesthetically beautiful even metaphysically.
Like spirals. Repeating varieties of patterns. Certain ratios.
These seem to also be in humanity like you said. As a typical human we typically find facial features matching up with the golden ration in various ways to be more attractive than otherwise wider or narrower ratio abiding features.
The human body is phi repeating. We find curves and angles more appealing than wide and distorted (fat) lines. Exceptions exist...
But overall it seems planned in not just humans, but all creation. In the flower of life.
Flowers themselves have been sexualized by humans, a certain somewhat well known artist showcased rather nicely how flowers can resemble genitalia.
In creation further, galaxies, stars, comet paths through gravity, (probably Gravity as well), and many other macroscopic phenomenon show this preference for curves and angles as well as the microscopic.
Why don't I find them sexy like a human body though? Its as you said, the human body has a desire.
However the human mind, can find those things sexy without arousal. In a way one might find a Lamborghini sexy.
Then from there I could curve down to the development of psychological obsessions with something perceived as sexy resulting in a fetish through sexualization and more.
So what is the metaphysical reason for this perceived sexiness in things like the golden ratio? The Phi Spiral? Angles and Patterns (two eyes, two ears, one nose, one mouth, two nostrils, two pupils, two brain hemispheres, two arms, two legs, two cheeks, two lips, one tongue, one genitalia, one heart, one liver, one stomach, four valves in the heart, enough blood vessels to expand around the Earth.....)
This patterns, this preference, this attraction towards...this sexy appeal of traits to be found attractive by a human, the effect of seeing something attractive to a person is biologically noteworthy, their heart speeds up, breath rate increases, blood pressure might rise, arousal or emotional response may follow or an intellectual response might but of it all.
Those effects occur on people looking at a forest, or over a valley from a mountain top, or while staring at the starry sky, or the ocean.
The metaphysical reason for sexy, I think, may be a refinement of desire or attraction to produce a finer more specific array of experiences.
An addendum or additionally concatenated info attached to whatever you're already putting out to the universe. Sort of like an advanced 'seek' (see: search) option, like specifying a search engine to show more specific types of results. Only in this case its an attempt to manifest more specific experiences.
...or something, I don't know lol
Metaphysically, sexy is subjective.
What is repulsive to one man another finds attractive.
Sort of like one man's trash is another man's treasure.
So unattractive people and attractive people both are one another with certain types of people seeing those traits of that person as either attractive or not regardless of what any one labeler (like myself) says.
Yet there seems to be some consensus of what is prominently aesthetically beautiful even metaphysically.
Like spirals. Repeating varieties of patterns. Certain ratios.
These seem to also be in humanity like you said. As a typical human we typically find facial features matching up with the golden ration in various ways to be more attractive than otherwise wider or narrower ratio abiding features.
The human body is phi repeating. We find curves and angles more appealing than wide and distorted (fat) lines. Exceptions exist...
But overall it seems planned in not just humans, but all creation. In the flower of life.
Flowers themselves have been sexualized by humans, a certain somewhat well known artist showcased rather nicely how flowers can resemble genitalia.
In creation further, galaxies, stars, comet paths through gravity, (probably Gravity as well), and many other macroscopic phenomenon show this preference for curves and angles as well as the microscopic.
Why don't I find them sexy like a human body though? Its as you said, the human body has a desire.
However the human mind, can find those things sexy without arousal. In a way one might find a Lamborghini sexy.
Then from there I could curve down to the development of psychological obsessions with something perceived as sexy resulting in a fetish through sexualization and more.
So what is the metaphysical reason for this perceived sexiness in things like the golden ratio? The Phi Spiral? Angles and Patterns (two eyes, two ears, one nose, one mouth, two nostrils, two pupils, two brain hemispheres, two arms, two legs, two cheeks, two lips, one tongue, one genitalia, one heart, one liver, one stomach, four valves in the heart, enough blood vessels to expand around the Earth.....)
This patterns, this preference, this attraction towards...this sexy appeal of traits to be found attractive by a human, the effect of seeing something attractive to a person is biologically noteworthy, their heart speeds up, breath rate increases, blood pressure might rise, arousal or emotional response may follow or an intellectual response might but of it all.
Those effects occur on people looking at a forest, or over a valley from a mountain top, or while staring at the starry sky, or the ocean.
The metaphysical reason for sexy, I think, may be a refinement of desire or attraction to produce a finer more specific array of experiences.
An addendum or additionally concatenated info attached to whatever you're already putting out to the universe. Sort of like an advanced 'seek' (see: search) option, like specifying a search engine to show more specific types of results. Only in this case its an attempt to manifest more specific experiences.
...or something, I don't know lol