05-12-2017, 09:31 PM
(07-29-2014, 02:21 AM)Adonai One Wrote: Why would one be miserable if they are "divinely happy"? Should such a person intentionally cease their happiness and act against it?
Does Ra truly suggest that dissatisfaction should be sought intentionally? Especially if one is satisfied?
Additionally, how does what you describe apply in the context of this quote, appearing to describe an entity appearing to be so satisfied it desires not to respond to catalyst?
Quote:42.2 ...The catalyst of experience works in order for the learn/teachings of this density to occur. However, if there is seen in the being a response, even if it is simply observed, the entity is still using the catalyst for learn/teaching. The end result is that the catalyst is no longer needed. Thus this density is no longer needed. This is not indifference or objectivity but a finely tuned compassion and love which sees all things as love. This seeing elicits no response due to catalytic reactions. Thus the entity is now able to become co-Creator of experiential occurrences. This is the truer balance.
Also, I acknowledge the fact it says "this density is no longer needed"; nonetheless, this still can occur in this density and exist in this density.
No In my opinion dissatisfaction is a necessary component for most entities to want to progress. So in my opinion Ra is saying expect dissatisfaction, and see it for what it's worth. A nice push forward.