How long will negative entities still be able to exist on the planet?

[BlatzAdict]

Of course, we know that Orion has influenced, and continues to influence, our world. So does the Confederation. Maybe Orion significantly influences our population. My point is that they aren't responsible for the presence of negative polarity on our planet. It wasn't the Orion empire that offered humans the ability to be greedy, selfish, and controlling, just as it wasn't the Confederation that offered us the ability to be compassionate, loving, and accepting. Finding one of those paths is why we're here, and the presence of greed and control in the world seems logical to me.

Right we can't attribute it to the ancient evil, we can attribute it to the personal choices people make on a personal level, and those people who may be blocked in some chakra create an opening by which to be influenced by that pain which a negative entity can then twist to seemingly blow out of proportion the perception of the severity of that pain.

It is not really by control, but alignment with the free will of an individual whether or not that individual has the means to completely discern. That is the basis for negative contact. 

At the same time, the existence of this Service to Self force has been around for a long time, one could consider it to be a lost spark of the infinite creator perhaps that has rejected the reincarnation process, and has rejected creation, while trying to create it's own facsimile of the creation.

One of the problems with the community is not being able to comprehend people that are this evil this selfish. it's like saying this probability of existence is not probable in an infinite universe. It's easy to assume that people like this don't exist, and that is why I am creating this Big Picture Project, to prove it.

If you listen to any whistleblowers speaking out against the Queen of England, you have an individual that constantly partakes in sex ritual orgies, with a very sadistic mean streak. I would say to be open since in the coming weeks, we will be trying to completely outline the work that proves all of this.


And Austin, I dug up this quote of David Rockefeller just for you:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years......It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”
― David Rockefeller

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
― David Rockefeller


What I do is out of a love for Service, however I always strive to make sure I have all my facts on straight including testimonials of victims. If you would spend part of your day looking into this more, you'd see that there is a plethora of material to go through. Since most people do not have that kind of time to disseminate and digest it, I've taken it upon myself to spend the last 10 years compiling the information in to one place.


Austin I did some extra credit and pulled this quote from Edward G Griffin, I pray that you will take heed:

• The very wise and wealthy financiers of the world--going way back, even before Rothschild's time--have observed that the world was a pretty rocky place to live in, and that nations were always fighting over something or other, there was always somebody who was trying to conquer somebody else, and wars were universal. Too bad about that, but that's the way it is. So we--the bankers--found out that if we loan money to them that we'll get paid back - they don't question what the interest rate is because they're fighting a war! And if they can win the war they can just plunder the victim and pay us whatever we want out of the plunder - it doesn't cost them anything really. Then the issue comes up of what happens if one of these nations decides not to pay us? Ah! The answer is very simple: if they refuse to pay us back we'll finance an opposing nation, a revolutionary group somewhere else to become an enemy of that nation and attack it, and destroy it, invade it. We'll create another war, in other words, in order to get our money back, we'll finance this side to attack that side. And so, by financing all sides in a war, and keeping the world divided up into warring fractions so that no one unit is particularly stronger than the other, the banks can continue to finance all sides of wars forever, and always collect their interest, because they have the ability of putting one nation against another nation against another nation to collect their debts.
  
  • From the documentary Corporate Fascism: The Destruction of America's Middle Class (2011) [1]
    

This quote is exactly the opus moderandi of the banking elite a documentary by Edward G Griffin.