(11-25-2010, 01:47 AM)Meerie Wrote: from the online etymology dictionary "obsession":
Meerie, I'm curious why you're choosing the term obsession. It seems to have a rather negative context.
Are you saying that vegetarians are obsessive?
If a person truly believes they are working for a good cause, then their actions might seem obsessive to those who don't identify with that cause. Is that a bad thing?
All of us, who are working to lighten the vibration on this planet, might seem obsessive to those who don't share our intentions.
For some of us, exposing the cruelties imposed on millions of our 2D brethren, on a daily basis, in part of that mission to raise the vibration.
Some of us are working on environmental issues...some are feeding the homeless...are not all of these noble causes?
Why, then, is the cause of championing animals viewed as fanatical, or obsessive? While championing the homeless and the hungry human is viewed as noble? Why is this?
I realize that not everyone shares in a resonance with this cause, but I invite you to try viewing this from the perspective of one who feels compassion for those who cannot speak for themselves, for those who are oppressed.
Perhaps then, vegetarians might be viewed as fellow Lightworkers, working together to raise the vibration of the planet in the way they resonate with, rather than just obsessive fanatics.
