I am Ra. No.

[kristina]

Although Ra seem to answer in one way or another every single question, ot at least comment in some way in the few cases when they won't (as in the case of


Questioner: Are there any examples of sixth-density negatively polarized
Wanderers in our historical past?
Ra: I am Ra. This information could be harmful. We withhold it."

where they at least give an explanation for refusing to provide information, there are two cases where they decline the queries with absolutely no comment or explanation. The first such case appears in book 1:

Questioner: Is there a “best way” to meditate?
Ra: I am Ra. No.

Then in book 2, following a reply of over 30 lines that includes reference to the importance of meditation, Don pops the simple question again that prompts an abrupt and unexpected shortness of a reply.

Questioner: Will you recommend a technique of meditation?
Ra: I am Ra. No.

There are several cases when they refuse to give an answer, but in ALL of those cases they provide an explanation - could be harmful, law of confusion, intervening material needed, etc. Except these two, which are essentially the same, but also different enough for there to be a chance of a slightly different reply (the sessions are over 11 weeks apart) with at least some comment at least for the second one. Yet we have these two simple No's. I understand why they're a no and not a yes. But not even a voluntary listing of ways and techniques (they do provide that information regarding techniques in another reply though, so obviously not a "secret", and they often add further unrequested comments voluntarily) nor any comment whatsoever. Has this stood out for anyone else? Any thoughts as to why no comment at all? Might be trivial, but then again could be on to something.

*Regarding the question, "is there a best way to meditate?" For who? I think you may have to process the way in which the question is being assimilated. Is there a best way to meditate? Quite frankly, no. No there isn't.
*Regarding the question, "Will you recommend a technique of meditation?" That is a tiny breach in the Law of Confusion. If you contemplate it for a moment you'll see that it's clear that they don't want to recommend a type of meditation, rather they want them to discover a technique based on their own freewill, experience and so forth.