02-15-2011, 11:46 AM
I don't think we can blame the current social structure in the West.
The current social structure is legitimately thus:
1. People can elect their government.
2. People can choose what to do with their money. Don't like evil corporations? Don't support them.
Ownership may be orange ray but that doesn't make it wrong. Ownership ultimately means that people do have a level of control over their lives.
People are busy, yes, but not too busy. They have the opportunity to vote their conscience and to use their wallet for the service of others.
If you ask me, people ARE doing this. In droves.
All that is needed is for people to care and value their fellow human beings and wish for a brighter world. We don't need to have a billion people start meditating - I don't even think meditation is endemic to 3D reality.
People meditate on Earth because the veil is so thick they need to hack reality to get the peace and love and bliss they crave.
Overt spirituality is just not necessary for harvest. What is necessary is for people to choose to care. I think they do this. Not in a loud way. They aren't making an announcement or putting up a billboard. They're just deciding inside their own head that, you know what, instead of spending all my money on house renovations I'm going to send some to the africans. Or instead of spending all my energy at the office I'm going to sign up to be a Big Brother/Big Sister.
You can't measure these kinds of decisions by watching the news. The corporate drones organize themselves using money, but this doesn't mean they are acting in an STS fashion.
Stop looking at money as a selfish tool and rather look at is as an organizing tool and even an empowering tool. People really do have free choice about where to send their dollars. And I think more and more people, including 3D types, are choosing to send them to others because they value others. Not out of selfish intent but simply because they are waking up to the fact that they love each other and that helping others helps themselves. It's win-win.
Inevitably lots of people are not going to graduate - but that's how it should be. The densities aren't meant to have full harvests, it would be inefficient just like full employment is inefficient. I really think the dire predictions of a poor harvest are premature and misguided. There will be time to do a post-mortem, port-mortem.
The current social structure is legitimately thus:
1. People can elect their government.
2. People can choose what to do with their money. Don't like evil corporations? Don't support them.
Ownership may be orange ray but that doesn't make it wrong. Ownership ultimately means that people do have a level of control over their lives.
People are busy, yes, but not too busy. They have the opportunity to vote their conscience and to use their wallet for the service of others.
If you ask me, people ARE doing this. In droves.
All that is needed is for people to care and value their fellow human beings and wish for a brighter world. We don't need to have a billion people start meditating - I don't even think meditation is endemic to 3D reality.
People meditate on Earth because the veil is so thick they need to hack reality to get the peace and love and bliss they crave.
Overt spirituality is just not necessary for harvest. What is necessary is for people to choose to care. I think they do this. Not in a loud way. They aren't making an announcement or putting up a billboard. They're just deciding inside their own head that, you know what, instead of spending all my money on house renovations I'm going to send some to the africans. Or instead of spending all my energy at the office I'm going to sign up to be a Big Brother/Big Sister.
You can't measure these kinds of decisions by watching the news. The corporate drones organize themselves using money, but this doesn't mean they are acting in an STS fashion.
Stop looking at money as a selfish tool and rather look at is as an organizing tool and even an empowering tool. People really do have free choice about where to send their dollars. And I think more and more people, including 3D types, are choosing to send them to others because they value others. Not out of selfish intent but simply because they are waking up to the fact that they love each other and that helping others helps themselves. It's win-win.
Inevitably lots of people are not going to graduate - but that's how it should be. The densities aren't meant to have full harvests, it would be inefficient just like full employment is inefficient. I really think the dire predictions of a poor harvest are premature and misguided. There will be time to do a post-mortem, port-mortem.