04-26-2021, 03:55 PM
(04-26-2021, 11:53 AM)Patrick Wrote: Yet why so many people believe it's a good idea to have poverty for example? When the idea is shared that poverty does not need to exist, too many people reacts in a way that rejects those ideas and prefers to keep the structures in place that enables poverty to endure.
It's not even a question of believing that anything could fix poverty, but believing that the attempt should be made or not. When given the choice to try something that could eradicate poverty, they prefer to vote for what will maintain poverty.
These kind of choices that we make empowers STS to provide even more of their teachings based on the Law of Squares. We are doing this to ourselves.
Poverty is a different issue, there are:
A. people who choose to be in poverty / who choose he/she actually lacks nothing.
B. people who feel trapped in poverty / who feel he/she always lacking.
C. people who has the need to feel superior in wealth compared to other people.
People who are in B and C is actually two sides of the same coin.
The examples on the edge of each polarity might be:
-People who do not feel enough even though he has million dollars in assets might fell into B and/or C.
-People who feel enough even though he earn $0 month fell into A.
Example of people in A might be: Jesus, Siddharta, Jon Jandai
Jon Jandai is a good example of people who initially in B and then come into realization and turn towards A.
For people in B and C no matter how much that they earn they will always wanted more, because they always feel lacking. Usually it's more of relatively lacking (compared to other people).
Choose Happiness, Gelong Thubten
https://youtu.be/b0wg1Pv0pfM