Are you going to take the vaccine?

[zedro]

I have one thing to add about inner guidance, based on experience, but I don't expect it to be useful at present, though it could potentially be later (some years ahead perhaps).

I've experienced sensitivity to some things coming and going over the years as a result of, in hindsight, gaining and losing subconscious expectations. For example, using wifi connections - I could feel that, for some years, but then it lost its impact, and I realized the pattern of what I had experienced earlier matched earlier subconscious expectations (e.g. a sensation gradually building).

Inner guidance in practice tends to be a mixture of several types of influence from several sources, difficult to tell apart at this level, yet the nature of it all is known at a different level. The confusion at this level may be compensated for in advance by some symbolic information, which can potentially be made sense of later, which sometimes works and sometimes doesn't.

I can't tell you which parts of what you experience are what, but on one thing I have a guess. I think that some years later, the sensitivity to those vaccinated some days earlier (which you described in an earlier post) may turn out to have followed subconscious expectations.

I wouldn't really expect you to take such possibilities seriously without firsthand learning that type of lesson through experience. Maybe that's the case with most who have a strong inner guidance to speak of.

Well I'm being vague about the types of guidance I get (literally a multitude of vectors), and I'm well aware of negative sources, the experiences I've had have been very intense, and have been tested in many ways to hone my discernment, and it hasn't been pleasant, but I asked for it (I've addressed this since I started posting, it's what compelled me to start). And to claim it's due to a subconscious expectation, we'll that road goes both ways, the fact that it's being projected in only one direction only shows one's bias.

But even without being hit over the head with guidance, it still comes down to a very logical conclusion: I do not feel I need it because I am NOT operating in fear. This is what perplexes me, when people claim that those who are not getting jabbed are being fearful or reacting to fear based propaganda, well why is that the default logical path? Couldn't it be argued that those who feel they need to be jabbed are actually operating out of fear, and trying to project it as love? Again, it's because someone who accepts the "you need this" narrative will flip the love/fear paradigm to suit the bias created by someone's else's narrative. If we were operating without any narrative, acceptance of one's fate would be the default, and all other action would be based on the illusion of self preservation, otherwise known as fear, or 1st ray.

It's something I keep pointing out, yet unsurprisingly those with a bias bypass the fundamental nature of the question: if you are not fearful, then why is it necessary? If your answer is "because love..." you've already entered a narrative, or an illusionary game, because the rest of that sentence needs to be completed to justify it.

I don't actually want an answer or further debate, just self reflection.

Remember:
Acceptance alone = 4th ray is undistorted
Unwise decision/judgement = 5th ray is distorted -->leads to unwise action = 3rd ray (and down) becomes distorted --> 4th ray may become more shrouded.
So be wise with your actions if you cannot operate under pure acceptance alone. And try not to distort what pure acceptance actually means, because it cannot be justified through 3rd ray (and down) distortions/narratives/actions. This is what makes participation so challenging, where pure acceptance is the cheat code to circumvent/navigate all the possible distortions/pitfalls. The result will be unique and preset, and most definitely void of fear.