03-05-2011, 05:46 PM
(03-05-2011, 03:23 PM)Ens Entium Wrote:(03-05-2011, 11:58 AM)zenmaster Wrote: But could one equally say that logos is passive, or the exact opposite of what you are saying here? Ra does equate it to 'love', and love allows 'light' (the active principle).
Light is not the active principle. Light is used and directed by Love. If anything, light only expresses that which love ordains. To me the Logos and sub-Logoi are quite causative. I should've been more clear but by active principle i meant, a principle that has an intrinsic source of activity. .. as constrasted with a principle that is invoked/applied/expressed by some external agent. This is how i tried to capture my idea of 'cause'.
that love you speak of, however, is not green ray love. its second distortion.
technically its above all kinds of things that one can relate to this octave and any meaning of its densities. for, even when the 8th density has been passed and 2nd d of the next octave starts, the 'love' you speak of still is an infinite octave away from being realized.
english word lacks wordage to be used for that concept. instead, word love is used by Ra. this was also explicitly stated.
this causes A LOT of confusion in people.
Quote:They seem quite active.
I'm glad you mentioned that though because it moved me to think about this. Another thing one can say is that the regularity of causation of the Logos (Logos/sub-Logos/sub-sub-Logos) is in proportion to how regularized it's emmanations and extractions-syntheses of love/light are. Session 13 of LOO is good for considering this point for the Logos and session 18 similarly so for the sub-sub-logos.
Maybe it's this regularity in causation that creates an apparentness of passivity.
or maybe its simply because from 4d and on, the entity is able to grasp and communicate/interact with the sun consciously ?