04-26-2011, 01:15 AM
(04-26-2011, 12:38 AM)Azrael Wrote: Wouldn't the resolution thus be that every path is a positive path and "positive" and "negative" are only distinctions to denote two primary characteristics of a sentient, ensouled being?
Each density has certain characteristics. 3D has the characteristic of being the density of Choice.
(04-26-2011, 12:38 AM)Azrael Wrote: Ra has no polarization, which would suggest to me that even though he is aware of both the paths, the RECOMMENDATION is the path is STO, but it seems very clear the STS is equally valid.
Correct. Ra is anapologetically biased in favor of STO, and have the intention of answering the call of STO entities.
(04-26-2011, 12:38 AM)Azrael Wrote: The images of the two paths are the confusing matter, the concepts of "good and evil" which is absurd.
Ultimately, both paths are equally valid. However, at this nexus, we must choose.
(04-26-2011, 12:38 AM)Azrael Wrote: Also, I continue to be told that "this is how it is in this density at this time", but as a rational, inquisitive human being how can I take that on a whim when I have read other teachings that suggest a more malleable state?
This is subject to subjective opinion. I personally believe that 3D reality is very, very malleable.
(04-26-2011, 12:38 AM)Azrael Wrote: No one has asked me how I have interpreted what I have read of the Law of One,
Azrael, how have you interpreted the Law of One?
(04-26-2011, 12:38 AM)Azrael Wrote: it seems to me there is almost a discrimination here towards those whom consider themselves "STO".
Yes. Ra is biased towards STO. Other, STS entities may assist those who are biased towards STS. Ra is not God.
(04-26-2011, 12:38 AM)Azrael Wrote: I see a lot of quoting of Ra and very little use of the Law of One in practice when it comes to communication,
You may have a valid point there. It's far easier to wax eloquent than it is it apply the principles.
(04-26-2011, 12:38 AM)Azrael Wrote: there is much bias here.
Yes. Unapologetically so. It is not our task to provide a welcome to those seeking STS polarization.
(04-26-2011, 12:38 AM)Azrael Wrote: Polarization is not bias, it is preference. I intend to make a thread regarding these concerns. Would you turn a student away if they don't understand or accept the teachings because of your own preferences?
No one is turned away, provided they honor the guidelines.