06-03-2011, 09:20 AM
How can there be 'no mistakes', yet then an identification of 'mistakes'? Sounds like Ra's reluctant use of 3D 'understanding'.
Folks, there are errors in judgement - often seen in retrospect. We call them 'mistakes'. Big deal. People here tend to be hyper-sensitive to pointing out 'flawed' actions. I think it's either due to some identification with personal value or worth to that action, or that the perceived intention of the action was the more important consideration. This is the realm of comparison or duality. One can work within and benefit from that illusion (by creating knowledge systems) while simultaneously not identifying with it (i.e. as would be indicated by the disowned, unconscious emotional responses to upsetting evaluations).
Folks, there are errors in judgement - often seen in retrospect. We call them 'mistakes'. Big deal. People here tend to be hyper-sensitive to pointing out 'flawed' actions. I think it's either due to some identification with personal value or worth to that action, or that the perceived intention of the action was the more important consideration. This is the realm of comparison or duality. One can work within and benefit from that illusion (by creating knowledge systems) while simultaneously not identifying with it (i.e. as would be indicated by the disowned, unconscious emotional responses to upsetting evaluations).
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)