Guardians from the Octave above

[111]

So at this point right before completion, in balancing All that an entitys journey to unity has encompassed the Law of responsibility draws this entity in some form to Help ALL other enteties in creation? I make a connection in my mind to the "guardians" I have stated in this thread that I believe once the entity passes the tests of this octave, their spirit always remains in this octave as a "holy spirit" of sorts. Helping all of those in this octave towards graduation through Inspiration and service. This is 100% backed by this Law of responsibility. These Guardians from the octave above seem to me to be both Physically incarnate Wanderers and The spirit which draws us all toward unity. By inspiring with the knowledge that graduation of this octave is acheivable. I definitly see the connection to the Law of responsibility

---

Frankly, I'm trying to make that clear because I don't want us to start throwing around "Law of Responsibility" as some sort of doctrine that places others on "lower standing".

---

So far, I think it's working.

Perhaps the beings who approved Ra's actions knew exactly what they were doing by understanding that given the veil of the planet, Ra was being naive and compromising the idea that enlightenment is a delicate balance that requires more participation of the self. So they let Ra do something that would result in learning for them.

While Ra has no emotional attachment to outcome, it's possible that they were acting outside of responsibility by believing they could impress such advanced teachings to a heavily veiled planet, and thus breaching the responsibility of letting such heavily veiled entities to work on enlightening themselves through other methods. They admitted this, saying the use of the pyramids were helpful for Ra's 3d evolution, but that these training-aid's were inappropriate for Earth's peoples.

It seems that Ra tried to spoon-feed too much info, thus skipping the more illusory steps first. On a lesser veiled planet, this doesn't seem to be a problem.

This could also stem from the curiosity of the questioners with L/L Research