More Positive but Less Harvestable

[3DMonkey]

34.17 Questioner: Is it possible for you to use as an example our General Patton and tell me the effect that war had on him in his development?
Ra: I am Ra. This will be the last full question of this working. The one of whom you speak, known as George, was one in whom the programming of previous incarnations had created a pattern or inertia which was irresistible in its incarnation in your time/space. This entity was of a strong yellow ray activation with frequent green ray openings and occasional blue ray openings. However, it did not find itself able to break the mold of previous traumatic experiences of a bellicose nature.

This entity polarized somewhat towards the positive in its incarnation due to its singleness of belief in truth and beauty. This entity was quite sensitive. It felt a great honor/duty to the preservation of that which was felt by the entity to be true, beautiful, and in need of defense. This entity perceived itself a gallant figure. It polarized somewhat towards the negative in its lack of understanding the green ray it carried with it, rejecting the forgiveness principle which is implicit in universal love.

The sum total of this incarnation vibrationally was a slight increase in positive polarity but a decrease in harvestability due to the rejection of the Law or Way of Responsibility; that is, seeing universal love, yet still it fought on.

This quote has so many facets.

There is a man who touches universal love but chooses his activist mentality for mankind instead.

There is flapping doors of green and blue energy waves.

There is a DECREASE in harvestability even when he is inching closer to positive. Does this mean he was around 96% negative and moved to, say, 94%?

If only he had used the Way of Responsibility to be even more bellicose towards others, he would have become harvestable. No?

Can we just 'bombard' this quote with our ideas?

---

I suppose he would've reincarnated as a terrorist to make harvest?