More Positive but Less Harvestable

[seejay21]

Nowhere in the LOO have I found Ra stating anything conclusively about anyones sts/sto orientation. The closest thing might be Hitler in which Ra states "..followed the pattern of negative polarization.." but refrains from actually saying that he was STS. So I don't know what you mean by discussing this material, as Ra NEVER says anything about judging others all day long. I would conclude that you aren't discussing the LOO at all, as this is never discussed in the LOO.

two parts of your above statements contradict each other - first, you say that various information about negative polarization patterns were given, second, you say that 'this is never discussed in Ra material'.

as you already yourself said, it was discussed in Ra material.

What i'm saying in my example is Ra never states that Hitler was STS. Yet we here everyday give people this "label".

you cant ignore the information you have just because you think 'judging' others is something that you need to refrain from.

its not about judging - its about what you DO with your judgment.

I say that judging others is something you should refrain from, because it will take you further away from the truth. If there isn't a Ra quote for this, it is because the question wasn't asked.

i gave that quote about identifying harvestable entities from 3d - even that information is present in the above form. i gave it, because it was the extreme end. hardest information to discern and use.

actually, there is endless amounts of information in regard to positive, negative behavior patterns. i didnt feel the need to list these, because these information occupy a few volumes of the material already. i reckoned that you would remember these, by memory. which apparently, you either dont, or, just dont want to remember.

List a few, I'll tell you what i think about them. What someone does as being of negative polarity, someone else could do the exact same thing, and be of positive polarity. Dicern that.

firstly, if you keep making such outlandish statements, i will have to discontinue discussing with you, since you are apparently talking about something which you havent read, or havent attentively read or spent time, or outright dont remember.

http://lawofone.info/results.php?search_...&ss=1&sc=1

'judgment' is something which is advised, emphasized, and actually to some degree, required :

opps. what i mean is the judgement of other beings. Where is the quote that says we should look at all other beings under the microscope, and tatoo a label on their foreheads with our findings?

http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?ses...c=1&ss=1#7

i am at a loss to see where it says 'dont judge' or 'dont use your judgment' in the above quote. it talks about accepting things as they are, in pursuit of love.

exactly! It doesn't say anything about Judgement and Judging others! it is the OPPOSITE!

as for spiritualism, if an entity doesnt use its judgment, how is it supposed discern right or wrong according to its path ?

It doesn't matter what anyone else does. You aren't being graded or measured against anyone but yourself.

---

..."You cannot remember your hand, their hands, perhaps even the rules of this game. This game can only be won by those who lose their cards in the melting influence of love, can only be won by those who lay their pleasures, their limitations, their all upon the table face up and say inwardly: “All, all of you players, each other-self, whatever your hand, I love you.” This is the game: to know, to accept, to forgive, to balance, and to open the self in love. This cannot be done without the forgetting, for it would carry no weight in the life of the mind/body/spirit being-ness totality"

It doesn't say in here, and decide if they are sts or sto before showing them your hand...