I interpret what Ra says differently. 'Love' is an expression of the logos. It is what has been uniquely actualized from that template. If we've evolved past the emotional need, then we have the beginnings of compassion - not the longing-for-acceptance stage experienced from late 2D to early-mid 3D.
That 2D dog's 'love' is the expression of the logos of an entity striving to enter 3D experience of self. It's a reflection of 3D catalyst offer to the 2D mind - a type of patterning. There is no capability for willed action, psychological projection, hopes, dreams, etc. 2D green-ray use does go beyond the point required for 2D harvest. It's also not the eventual green-ray activation point in 3D evolutionary learning where incarnations cease to become automatic and self-determination (use of will) is made.
The next-door neighbor's 'love' is similarly limited, not by what the 2D-experience of mind can provide, but by 'polarity' of an enspirited entity. Comparing that 'love' to 4D 'love' is like comparing a line to a plane or circumstantial understanding to certain understanding. It diminishes the concept of love in both cases.
That 2D dog's 'love' is the expression of the logos of an entity striving to enter 3D experience of self. It's a reflection of 3D catalyst offer to the 2D mind - a type of patterning. There is no capability for willed action, psychological projection, hopes, dreams, etc. 2D green-ray use does go beyond the point required for 2D harvest. It's also not the eventual green-ray activation point in 3D evolutionary learning where incarnations cease to become automatic and self-determination (use of will) is made.
The next-door neighbor's 'love' is similarly limited, not by what the 2D-experience of mind can provide, but by 'polarity' of an enspirited entity. Comparing that 'love' to 4D 'love' is like comparing a line to a plane or circumstantial understanding to certain understanding. It diminishes the concept of love in both cases.