More Positive but Less Harvestable

[Monica]

there are should nots at any given point in the development of an entity from 1 to end 8th density.

There is no 'right' or 'wrong' from the perspective of the One, but there is from the perspective of the many, depending on what the chosen path is. We've covered this ground before, in other threads. Ultimately, there aren't any mistakes, but from our perspective, there are definitely mistakes. If one wants to polarize STO and goes out and murders people, I'd say that's a mistake. But what is a mistake, anyway? But just inefficient use of catalyst. What is 'wrong' anyway? Inefficient use of catalyst, which will then attract undesirable consequences.

destroying planets with nuclear devices, are one of those should nots.

Yeah, I'd say destroying planets isn't cool.

the only way 3d entities, which are fresh out of 2d, which sees everything as an extension of self, manifest 'oneness' is through 2d mindset - herd, or seeing everything as an extension of self again. therefore, any thought/belief/emotion that is in the psyche, societal division of any group, seems to be seen as the 'oneness' that should be manifested.

Oh wow, I hadn't thought of it that way, but sounds right on! Very perceptive analysis there.

even if apparently all the populations on the planet get affected by that 'unification' concept, this especially gets to surface in blatant form in the groups which have been effected into religions that promote negativity over that 'oneness'. it is apparently a mechanic that bolsters the problem of manifesting oneness in 3d societies regressing back to 2d. the entities identify belief with themselves, and then attempt to unify everyone in it. and most affected are the societies which were culturally, or genetically effected by yahweh, or distorted by orion. the latter seems to have preferred to work over the framework yahweh created.

That actually explains a lot; why they seek to coerce everyone else to believe as they do.

you shouldnt get behind a certain message. you shouldnt manifest 'oneness' culturally in 3d either - 3d is a density of 'many'es, and there should be many different thoughts and patterns and whatsoever in this environment - not only because it is 3d, but also because there are a lot of souls from a lot of different places. this means a lot of spiritual biases, a lot of patterns.

Oneness is certainly an advanced concept. Maybe the focus should just be on acceptance. If the 3D entities could only accept one another despite their differences...

the exception is the cases in which these patterns are harmful to others' patterns - like blowing up an entire planet through weapons, or subduing/massacring/brainwashing masses through technology, or somehow affecting their development adversely.

This illustrates my response to Tenet: Telling others how to live isn't appropriate...unless they start interfering with others...then it is appropriate to not let them impose on others...whether it's imposing their religion or blowing up a planet...that is imposing and it crosses a line.

true approach should be, not only allowing but accepting different thoughts, perspectives, patterns, approaches without trying to unify or 'uniformize' them.

Exactly!

'let them be' as long as they dont break others seems to be the necessity.

Is there an echo in here?