More Positive but Less Harvestable

[Tenet Nosce]

I added to the last part of my reply , if you didn't notice.

It had nothing to do with being vegan.

Do you know for a fact that is true? So the newspapers, courts, doctors, etc. are all lying? Misinformed, maybe?

Gosh, I don't know we don't seem to be getting anywhere on this particular point. I feel like you know what I am talking about, but for some reason we are not connecting on this.

veganism + zealotry = harm

NOT

veganism = harm

Veganism is still part of the equation. YES... you could of course substitute any number of other things in there because the zealotry part of the equation carries much more weight.

guns + zealotry = harm

religion + zealotry = harm

But this is not true for all things. potatoes + zealotry DO NOT = harm because potatoes do not carry the same potential for harm within them.

Zealotry = An ethical dogma based on an absolutist interpretation of a philosophical principle on conduct.

Therefore, using the Law of One in an attempt to derive a clear-cut approach to ethical decision making = recipe for disaster... just like unity100 is cautioning against in his/her posts.

Those people were obviously insane.

YES! YES! YES! So what can we do to help prevent against an otherwise reasonable idea, like veganism, from being twisted in the mind of an insane person, or zealot? Any ideas?