07-14-2011, 11:04 AM
(07-13-2011, 10:53 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: So between 9500BC and, say 2500BC, what happened, according to your understanding?
somehow, technology regressed.
Quote:Wait. Are you saying that Ra was the burning bush? And that Moses walked the Earth in 9500BC? If not, what are you saying?
im saying your considerations about Ra not being accurate in regard to time, are unfounded.
(07-13-2011, 11:37 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:(07-13-2011, 09:45 PM)unity100 Wrote: you either dont remember these, or havent paid attention to these, but you are making rather far flung conclusions.
Hence the ?? I am not giving an authoritative discourse, I am thinking out loud. Writing helps me to better view my thoughts. Sharing it with others helps me to see where there might be blind spots or gaps. So, thanks. I think?
the problem here is that, because you are formulating your strays into analysis by skipping over the information you can easily obtain, your analysis is falling short and off-base of what it could have accomplished.
you are starting your analysis gimped. if you just engage in a few researches into lawofone.info site, you wont. and the results will be much better.
Quote:Any ideas how to break this pattern? Or turn it to the positive?
the logos of this solar system needs to change its attitude towards heavy veiling.
Quote:Any ideas how one person may be of service in this regard?
complain to logos about it.
Quote:I propose that one person, or a whole planet of them, may arrive at the conclusion of not destroying themselves with nuclear devices, without invoking any such should-ness, if it exists.
societies regressing into orange get devoid of proper reasoning. hence, they go to extremes about whatever they are pursuing. this brings about another conclusion - populations regressing back to 2d shouldnt have access to technology or advanced physical brain capabilities, even in 3d. just like how 2d entities dont have.
otherwise, is like giving 5 year old kids shotguns.
Quote:See, my mind goes from oneness, to connectedness. Not from oneness, to unifiedness. So, if there is a unified message to be found, it is from the connectedness that naturally follows.
Any ideas how to counteract all these problems?
it is not something you can single handedly counteract. it is possibly a lesson of this solar system, or even galaxy. best you could do would be to learn the lesson individually, and move forward. everyone else will learn theirs whenever they will.
Quote:Redux should-ness. But given our differences, how may we harmonize without sacrificing individuality?
that seems to be a different angle. there is a certain amount of individuality needing to be sacrificed for harmonizing, if you are talking about the process that goes on from end 3d towards 8d.
Quote:"I believe in the One Lord My God, and His Son Jesus Christ, my Savior. I believe God hates homosexuals, and that the Bible commands me to put them to death. I believe that Allah commands me to sacrifice my life, and the lives of others, for the jihad. I believe that veganism is the one true way to eat, even if it kills my baby. I believe there is no higher anything, and I can treat people however I please."
there are two arguments in the above meshed in one pot, whereas they do not have the same properties.
everything you spoke about the semitic belief system, is the bias of this societal experience. even more, it is the conditioned bias of a certain segment of this planetary population. even if propelled and propagated by various negative concepts behind, they are particularly societal biases of the mind. even though they are portrayed to be positive, they are inherently negative acts. so, while seeming for the positive path, it is actually for the negative path. so even if you interpret the negativity behind those propositions to be a universal phenomenon or path, the propositions themselves are self-betraying - anyone accepting those with positive intents will suffer the hypocrisy.
what you say about vegan/veganism, is something that does not originate from this societal experience, but from the choice of two paths as positive and negative. and actually even further, non-polarized path, if you consider that the purpose of existence is manifesting, and since there is an infinite amount of manifestation to be done, the wisest route is to make sure noone destroys another's manifestation, so that manifestations can be maximized, leading to more varied and numerous experiences while discovering infinity. vegetarianism/veganism, if applied properly, are in alignment with these principles. therefore they end up an application of a path like the above, BUT, there is no contradiction, fallacy, or lying in it. it is what it is. anyone choosing the path to positive, or, path of unifiedness, would benefit from incorporating these practices into their path, because they are a part of that path.