An appreciation of 'Outlier' Don Elkins

[kycahi]

This is the comments:

RE: 1981.01.05 - 1981.01.15 Last Hatonn Contact Before Ra
Some new information just released by David Wilcock. This document contains several transmissions from Hatonn, and a few from Latwii, to a group operating in the SE Michigan area during the 50's and early 60's.

http://divinecosmos.com/media/1950s_ETs.pdf

When I read Hatonn's words here, I get the same sort of impressions. Hatonn seems to be genuinely concerned with being of service to humanity. At the same time, I see certain areas where they appear to have limited understanding.

For example, they say that all of creation is one, but then draw lines between the "light" and the "darkness". So, are the "dark ones" part of creation, or not? They say evil doesn't exist, but for the minds of men. They keep using "GOD" and "the Father" rather than the "One Infinite Creator". They speak much of love, but little of wisdom. They refer to the coming "cataclysm". They speak of the Father knowing what is "right" and "wrong" and what people "should" do. They speak of surrounding oneself with light from the outside, yet do not mention the inner light shining from within. And so on.

This is what I am attempting to get at by suggesting that the Ra contact was an intervention. Hatonn, gotta love 'em, doesn't seem to have much understanding of the dark path, even to the point where at times they seem to deny that it truly exists. They certainly don't understand that the "light" STO and "dark" STS paths are equally valid under the Law of One.

So given the context of a Disclosure-type event, it concerns me that Hatonn, or others of the same vibratory level, would fail to mention to humanity that there are actually two paths available and that there is nothing "wrong" about the dark path. It is simply another choice.

Third-density is about making the "Choice".... so how can somebody make a choice if they are only offered one option?

Hatonn was channeled by lots of folks, each of whom inevitably influenced the information at least a little. Hence "God," "Father," "should," "cataclysm" etc. That's why I see this source as adjunct to the Ra material.

People of a density higher than 3rd may not take seriously the concept of "dark" or "evil." I hope not, anyway. They're gross and ugly to me.

My computer choked on the pdf link.

I scanned this thread and saw comments about Don Elkins being unstable and schizophrenic. That is not the man I knew at all. In his first Physics class, I remember him saying that because it's an Engineering School, correct answers are everything--an engineer can't excuse a failing bridge with, "But I used the right method!" Many weeks later in a lab, he wrote problems on the board for us to solve on paper and turn in. One guy raised his hand and asked which method to use on one of them, and Don said, "As far as I'm concerned, you can use witchcraft as long as you have the right answer within 5%." He said what he meant and meant what he said.