Why do you believe?

[3D Sunset]

Hmm... hmm... So in your opinion, Ra would basically attempt to terminate a line of un-important questioning by providing stunted answers such as 'You are correct.', and in doing so preserve Don's freewill? So perhaps Ra listened to the question to see if there was anything remotely correct about it, while not elaborating on the in-correct aspects so as to move on to other topics? This could be argued to be a form of mis-information. I will agree however that that is not the same as deliberate inclusion of false material.

Here is a trivial example of what I'm talking about:

Questioner: What would happen to the entity if he did this? What would happen to his chariot?

Ra: I am Ra. The Creator is one being. The vibratory level of those able to breach the quarantine boundaries is such that upon seeing the love/light net it is impossible to break this Law. Therefore, nothing happens. No attempt is made. There is no confrontation. The only beings who are able to penetrate the quarantine are those who discover windows or distortions in the space/time continua surrounding your planet’s energy fields. Through these windows they come. These windows are rare and unpredictable.

Questioner: Does this account for what we call “UFO Flaps” where a large number of UFOs show up like in 1973?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

I would suggest that there was actually more to the story about 1973 than was implied by Ra's simple confirmation of an almost insignificant aspect of the "Flap" (that being the random window effect of the quarantine). But, unlike other cases where Ra expanded on Don's questions, in this case - due to its transitory and unimportant nature - Ra simply agrees and lets Don move on. In this example, no actual misinformation was implied, on other occasions though, I believe that misinformation can readily be inferred by readers not sensitive to the dynamic.

I see, and this is where my general question / concern arises, how are we to discern when this de-tuning happens? I suppose you have a good philosophy of not taking anything transient too seriously. I am having a hard time resolving the logical conflict within my intellect though. It's the same sort of conflict I would have with a normal person on the street giving me advice, that being, if part of what information given was bad, I would suspect the remainder as well. Of course Ra is not some person on the street, but in an effort not to raise any entity's authority above anyone elses, I am forced to apply the same thinking.

In all truth, in my humble opinion, you simply should not take anything that anyone says at face value. You should listen intently, contemplate, mediate and follow your own inner voice. At the point that your inner voice has weighed in affirmatively, you have crossed the chasm from belief to personal knowledge if not experience.

I see this as sound advice and I may just follow it The STS / 'Evil' thread is still coming, by the way...

I look forward to it.

Love and Light,

3D Sunset