Back to meat entrees...
I've long wondered if such entree-preference must be a convenience-feature-- Utilized to more-simply (instantly, easily, cheaply or quickly) obtain a certain standard of flavor along with a belief of re-energizing self.
Perhaps our personalized notions are correct or misinformed. After al, LOO seems to indicate all such things are 'distortions'. The veil, or may we say the pre-incarnate-forgetting, requires that we live our present-lives through the available, worldly 'distortions'. If not the most centralized and traditional distortions, found close to home.
Yet a major 'distortion' of our global-culture is science. No? A growing tradition demands that science aid us directly in choosing our 'personal-distortions' more wisely. Wise choices should banish error and promote well-being, (according to science).
The advent of instant-food or instant-nirvana should not lead us astray, however. Could that mean that we should mold our life with more care and more discretion? In case our personal habits cause stress or duress-- Should we carefully observe such issues, with intent to improve conditions on our world?
Perhaps too many questions follow and to many questions remain unasked.... If we personally feel too busy or stressed to provide longer-lasting meal-times, are we sure life fulfills advantageously? If we are too impatient to personally scrutinize peer-review science, will we have good information? Does our science-expert prove his/her health or stamina and is that important? Will we achieve our life aim on better or worse nutrition? ... Are my personalized 'distortions' worthy?
I've long wondered if such entree-preference must be a convenience-feature-- Utilized to more-simply (instantly, easily, cheaply or quickly) obtain a certain standard of flavor along with a belief of re-energizing self.
Perhaps our personalized notions are correct or misinformed. After al, LOO seems to indicate all such things are 'distortions'. The veil, or may we say the pre-incarnate-forgetting, requires that we live our present-lives through the available, worldly 'distortions'. If not the most centralized and traditional distortions, found close to home.
Yet a major 'distortion' of our global-culture is science. No? A growing tradition demands that science aid us directly in choosing our 'personal-distortions' more wisely. Wise choices should banish error and promote well-being, (according to science).
The advent of instant-food or instant-nirvana should not lead us astray, however. Could that mean that we should mold our life with more care and more discretion? In case our personal habits cause stress or duress-- Should we carefully observe such issues, with intent to improve conditions on our world?
Perhaps too many questions follow and to many questions remain unasked.... If we personally feel too busy or stressed to provide longer-lasting meal-times, are we sure life fulfills advantageously? If we are too impatient to personally scrutinize peer-review science, will we have good information? Does our science-expert prove his/her health or stamina and is that important? Will we achieve our life aim on better or worse nutrition? ... Are my personalized 'distortions' worthy?