6th-Density Negatively Polarized Wanderers?

[turtledude23]

I treat my unconscious mind with respect the majority of the time, are you trying to say that it doesn't matter if consciously dislike people in general because its not as central to polarization as how you treat yourself?

'liking' people is a personal thing and also deals with emotional bias. I don't think that liking has much to do with positive polarization, since polarization is dealing more with how the will is used in a transpersonal manner. If your orientation for 'manifesting reality' is inclusive of others as self, that's said to be 'positive'. That's because, inherently, other people represent aspects of one's own interiority (as we're all basically of the same source). How we consider others and ourselves is the most obvious basis of how the will is directed for polarization.

I don't understand your last 2 paragraphs, could you rephrase them?

The rational mind separates concepts out of an intrinsic whole, in order to process them linearly (create a causative chain). This separating process also has a profound effect on personality development. The bias engendered by this disposition is necessarily exclusionary when dealing with abstract concepts which ultimately form experience. But this bias can be mistaken for the service orientation of exclusion of others and of self, when in fact it's just a psychological processing characteristic.

In other words, what we use to create a valuing system and how we evaluate has little to do with polarization, which deals less with the mechanics of forming thought structures and processing information and more with how the spirit is brought to bare on life.

---

Very good points, thanks for sharing them.

I think the reason Ra with held that information was because a large portion of the wanderers on Earth now are likely formerly of the negative path, meaning the person who's reading that could be one or someone they know could be.

I agree with this, although the negative 4D+ population were always around 10% in actual number, so 'large portion' may be at most 1 out of 10 wanderers, unless negatives needed to wander more.

Ra said the 2 main reasons for 6D entities to wander are out of deep compassion and to balance wisdom/compassion. Many 6D entities wander out of compassion, but not necessarily to 3D. The second reason sounds more odd: the whole point of 6D is to balance the fine points of compassion/wisdom so surely the majority of entities who graduate into 6D can handle the "regular curriculum", so then what group of entities would have the greatest difficulty adjusting to 6D (which is positive only)? Former 5D negative entities. And where better for them to learn compassion for others than the density of choice? So if we assume that the vast majority of newly-positive 6D entities need to wander to 3D, and that 6D always-STO entities are less likely per capita to wander to 3D than 6D former-STS, then a significant portion of wanderers on Earth would be newly STO and have difficulty with compassion but talent with wisdom. This could explain why this forum has a healthy mix of people who have outwardly evident compassion, and people whose compassion is harder to detect.