(08-08-2011, 09:36 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote:Right Steven, not Alan.(08-07-2011, 08:23 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Or is it the 'Disclosure' of Alan Greer's 1992 'Disclosure Project' fame, where the US simply admits to a conspiracy to withhold information it may have regarding a cover up of ET visitation and any related black projects. That version certainly does not necessarily involve worldwide media. That would be a great thing to demand, because then some department in the US government becomes the authority to convey the meaning and purpose of ET visitation. Imagine the possibilities for how such a revelation could be framed.
You mean Steven Greer? He still runs a disclosure project.
(08-08-2011, 09:36 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: He was kind of funny on the Project Camelot interview. Very defensive.Greer is another consequentialist in the disclosure movement - not trustworthy, IMO.
(08-09-2011, 02:59 PM)hogey11 Wrote: I am arguing that disclosure will bring about a new set of conditions where those on the STS path will no longer be given the opportunity to control others like they had before.It will do the exact opposite. Confederation (the 'good guys') are always available to answer any questions for those that want to know the answers. What you are asking is for the confed to force a particular 'way', which is a free-will violation when others do not want to know the answers. So if they were to force their way, then the orions would be allowed to do the exact same thing, as the guardians will allow a precise balance.