08-22-2009, 09:29 AM
I would be more willing to accept the view that a planetary "logos" does not exist separately until a planet ascends, and this is what is meant by "harmonious interaction". Then the statement about people being the sub-sub-Logos and that mental interation by mind/body/spirit creates the planetary Logos make more sense. Until then the planet is "part of the logos", which would mean the analogy of a chakra in the solar logos (Ra also mentions a correspondence bewteen the densitities, Tarot principles and the planets). In ancient Egypt where Ra apparently was active the Sun was the main deity (also even the name Ra refers to this sun god), Earth was not venerated.
The concept of a separate planetary logos is also what is apparently used in certain theosophical circles to push for a global dictatorship (in order to enforce the harmonious interaction with the logos as interpreted by a privileged hierarchical elite), which is why I would be more careful with the concept.
The concept of a separate planetary logos is also what is apparently used in certain theosophical circles to push for a global dictatorship (in order to enforce the harmonious interaction with the logos as interpreted by a privileged hierarchical elite), which is why I would be more careful with the concept.