08-24-2009, 11:47 AM
Sunset, you put the finger on the sore spot for me.
I have extreme difficulty conceptualizing the logos. I do think I have an intuitive understanding. But anytime I try to conceptualize the beast I end up describing something that is is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike my intuitive understanding of the logos.
I would like to add some notions of the logos...
Logos never exists separately but always in relation to.
Logos is not an entity though entities can be seen as logos.
Logos is different if you look at it from another angle.
Intelligent infinity is a way of viewing the logos.
Logos is like consciousness but from the outside in, not the inside out.
What do you think of these points? Can you add some more?
I have the feeling that if we know exactly what the logos is there will not be any questions left.
I have extreme difficulty conceptualizing the logos. I do think I have an intuitive understanding. But anytime I try to conceptualize the beast I end up describing something that is is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike my intuitive understanding of the logos.
I would like to add some notions of the logos...
Logos never exists separately but always in relation to.
Logos is not an entity though entities can be seen as logos.
Logos is different if you look at it from another angle.
Intelligent infinity is a way of viewing the logos.
Logos is like consciousness but from the outside in, not the inside out.
What do you think of these points? Can you add some more?
I have the feeling that if we know exactly what the logos is there will not be any questions left.