Logoi and Co-creators

[greywolf]

Questioner: Then the planet which we walk upon here would be some form of sub-sub-Logos. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. A planetary entity is so named only as Logos if It is working in harmonic fashion with entities or mind/body complexes upon Its surface or within Its electromagnetic field.

Questioner: Do the sub-Logoi such as our sun have a metaphysical polarity positive or negative as we have been using the term?

Ra: I am Ra. As you use the term, this is not so. Entities through the level of planetary have the strength of intelligent infinity through the use of free will, going through the actions of beingness. The polarity is not thusly as you understand polarity. It is only when the planetary sphere begins harmonically interacting with mind/body complexes, and more especially mind/body/spirit complexes, that planetary spheres take on distortions due to the thought complexes of entities interacting with the planetary entity. The creation of the one infinite Creator does not have the polarity you speak of.

Based upon this, it would seem that the harmonic interactions can be with mind/bodies (i.e., 2D life forms) as well as mind/body/spirits (i.e., 3D life forms). So by "harmonic", I think Ra means that there is a mutual give and take between the lifeforms - like evolution say - not that the give and take is necessarily always in perfect harmony (as might be more expected in 4D and beyond). So, it wold not make sense to me that a planet would be a Logos while in 2d then revert to its parent Logos while in "disharmonious" 3D until it can again emerge as a Logos in 4D. Much more likely that the Earth has emerged as a Logos distinct from, but hierarchically subordinate to, its Sun Logos when it emerged from its timeless state in late 1D.

I think I see now how this can be interpreted that way. Perhaps another reason for the statement about the questioner being a sub-sub-logos is the other statement that one single logos has created the entirety of this particular galaxy. Perhaps in this galaxy there could then be some form of direct relationship between planets and the "galactic center" or "primal source". A planetary logos if it exists seems to be a fairly passive entity in general, I think Ra also mentions the solar logos setting the parameters/rules (or "distortions") for the entire solar system.