Logoi and Co-creators

[3D Sunset]

I'm not sure I see it as a violation of free will since the power to act is not altered only the subsequent design modified somewhat.

It would seem to me that the modification of the design from that which was produced by the planetary logos is, per se, an infringement of its free will to create designs. It would seem to me that the term "not invented here" may apply.

And this design I see as being carried out passively through its own momentum, since an activist planetary logos would surely prevent negative polarization (given how it's discouraged) or destruction of the planet at least.

You lost me on this train of thought. Please elucidate what you mean by "And this design I see as being carried out passively through its own momentum"

As for planetary Logoi being able to prevent destruction of the planet, I would suggest that this is not the case as witnessed by both Mars and Maldek.

Also the design of the Earth need not involve third density beings at all, they after all are said to come freely from around the galaxy anyway.

True, it need not. But the time had come for it to, as was obviously the plan of the solar system and galactic Logoi.

And a pre-determined design or mold on them seems to be a violation of their free will to evolve as they wish.

I believe that we are making the same point from slightly different perspectives, and it gets back to the issue of harmonious interaction between planet and m/b/s complexes. If those m/b/s complexes are allowed to evolve and transition to and through 3D on their home planet, using the designs of the home planet that were harmoniously developed between the m/b complexes and the home planet, then it would seem that both parties free will remains uninfringed.

Per your argument, in the case where an alien is injected into a foreign planet, it's free will is infringed if the available m/b complexes are too different than on its home planet.

Similarly, by my argument, the planet's free will is infringed if changes are made to its locally developed m/b complexes in an attempt to minimize the changes experienced by alien entities now inhabiting the planet.

I am beginning to like this train of thought.

The quarantine can maybe be seen as some kind of "double punishment" after infringing the free will, but it can also be seen as a negative compensatory act after giving the enhancements, blocking further assistance towards polarization in either direction (so assistance can only be given if invoked through free will). On other planets/systems more direct interference is perhaps possible.

I haven't really gotten into the question of how the quarantine was intended to be effective, but I don't see it as a punishment. Rather, I see it as a protection because it was felt that the changes may well have included a tendency toward negative polarization. I will offer as an example here the opposable thumb which Ra states was selected by our Logos for its 3D forms.

Questioner: There seems to have been created by this Logos, to me anyway, a large percentage of entities whose distortion was towards warfare. There have been the Maldek and Mars experiences and now Earth. It seems that Venus was the exception to what we could almost call the rule of warfare. Is this correct and was this envisioned and planned into the construction of the archetypical mind, possibly not with respect to warfare as we have experienced it but as to the extreme action of polarization in consciousness?

Ra: I am Ra. It is correct that the Logos designed Its experiment to attempt to achieve the greatest possible opportunities for polarization in third density. It is incorrect that warfare of the types specific to your experiences was planned by the Logos. This form of expression of hostility is an interesting result which is apparently concomitant with the tool-making ability. The choice of the Logos to use the life-form with the grasping thumb is the decision to which this type of warfare may be traced.

Questioner: Then did our Logos hope to see generated a positive and negative harvest from each density up to the sixth, starting with the third, as being the most efficient form of generating experience known to It at the time of Its construction of this system of evolution?

Ra: I am Ra. Yes.

Was there perhaps another change that was local to Mars, that it was felt important to bring forward to 3D Earth, that also created a bias toward STS rather than our Logos' preferred bias toward STO? If so, then the quarantine would be appropriate for these three reasons acting in concert: 1) infringement of m/b/s complexes free will, 2) infringement of planetary free will, and 3) infringement of the Solar systems' free will to bias 3D toward STO.

Pure speculation here, but interesting thoughts none the less.

3D Sunset