08-26-2009, 04:22 PM
(08-26-2009, 03:59 PM)3D Sunset Wrote:(08-26-2009, 01:54 PM)greywolf Wrote: I'm not sure I see it as a violation of free will since the power to act is not altered only the subsequent design modified somewhat.
It would seem to me that the modification of the design from that which was produced by the planetary logos is, per se, an infringement of its free will to create designs. It would seem to me that the term "not invented here" may apply.
Well with this argument any human action on the planet is also a violation of this free will.
(08-26-2009, 03:59 PM)3D Sunset Wrote:(08-26-2009, 01:54 PM)greywolf Wrote: And this design I see as being carried out passively through its own momentum, since an activist planetary logos would surely prevent negative polarization (given how it's discouraged) or destruction of the planet at least.
You lost me on this train of thought. Please elucidate what you mean by "And this design I see as being carried out passively through its own momentum"
That the logos does nothing subsequent to creating a design.
(08-26-2009, 03:59 PM)3D Sunset Wrote:(08-26-2009, 01:54 PM)greywolf Wrote: Also the design of the Earth need not involve third density beings at all, they after all are said to come freely from around the galaxy anyway.
True, it need not. But the time had come for it to, as was obviously the plan of the solar system and galactic Logoi.
And if there is no prior design for third density there was no violation of it.
(08-26-2009, 03:59 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: Per your argument, in the case where an alien is injected into a foreign planet, it's free will is infringed if the available m/b complexes are too different than on its home planet.
No it's a violation if there exists at all a design or plan for third density beings which they are expected to conform to in all their actions. Not just a template but something that's not allowed to be manipulated in any way.