08-26-2011, 11:40 AM
(08-25-2011, 10:02 PM)3DMonkey Wrote:(08-25-2011, 09:26 PM)unity100 Wrote:(08-25-2011, 08:57 PM)Raman Wrote: We are basically here for this event. It's coming and it will be how it will be. It is a quantum shift, a totally different vibratory state. It could not be any other way.
now come to think of it, it is indeed as such - the world population phenomenally increased in the last two centuries. leaving aside we were told that close to what - 2 billion entities came from elsewhere, and entities were coming here for harvest.
take a look, Tenet. Was this drastic change so "noticeable" to cause alarm in individuals of society?
Eh? 3DMonkey, I am confused by your posts here. Earth's human population has been on the increase throughout all of recorded human history [See attachment]. If population growth were to spontaneously reverse direction, it would be very noticeable, and people would demand an explanation.
I don't see how you could argue that the world would just go on either oblivious or indifferent to a shrinking population. Plus I offered some specific questions to help me better understand your POV, and you have not answered them.
As difficult as it may be to wrap my mind around a sudden quantum leap into a new reality, the "gradualist" view leads to even more absurd scenarios, and in addition offers no discernible benefit over the alternative. All it does is supposedly "buy more time" for an entity to become harvestable. If said entity wanted more "time" it was free to incarnate in any other period of human history. Given the last 6000 years, I can see an easy 100 additional incarnations or so that would have been available. But it didn't.
If an entity chose to incarnate here on Earth at the eleventh hour before harvest, and then made little to no use of the landslide of catalyst that has been made available to them over the past decade... well... what do you want me to say about that? Let's just keep the universe on hold until everybody gets a clue? I don't think it works that way.
So, anyway, I am open to hearing rational ideas and scenarios as to how a gradual harvest might play itself out, and pointed to some specific areas for further discussion. If you don't want to have a discussion, that's totally fine with me. But then there is no point of floating one-liners out there in response to a whole reply that I wrote, as I will just keep referring back to the specific questions that you have not responded to.