Unity wrote?
i am appalled how some of you are still making redefinitions of harvest
whereas it has been explicitly and clearly defined in detail in the
material.
-----------------------
I would say thats because some of us don't believe all of the Law of One as communicated by Ra. Its channelled material. How many times do we have to say this? No matter the purity of the transmission, you still have to question how much is Ra and how much is the bias of the channeller(s).
Ra is vague in many places. As all channelled entities are. Even Qu'o say to take them with a grain of salt..metaphorically speaking.
Or maybe thats just me. In any case, it ought to be questioned and analyzed on every point. Just like we do here all the time. To not do so leads to dogma.
Richard
i am appalled how some of you are still making redefinitions of harvest
whereas it has been explicitly and clearly defined in detail in the
material.
-----------------------
I would say thats because some of us don't believe all of the Law of One as communicated by Ra. Its channelled material. How many times do we have to say this? No matter the purity of the transmission, you still have to question how much is Ra and how much is the bias of the channeller(s).
Ra is vague in many places. As all channelled entities are. Even Qu'o say to take them with a grain of salt..metaphorically speaking.
Or maybe thats just me. In any case, it ought to be questioned and analyzed on every point. Just like we do here all the time. To not do so leads to dogma.
Richard