Quite interesting - Mayan day/nights and earth periods

[unity100]

Incorrect. Ra wasn't talking about the nazi's current state in regards to the harvest. They were being general, and they made this specifically clear because they knew the statement would be taken out of context..

35.1 It is to be noted that in discussing those who are well-known among your peoples there is the possibility that information may be seen to be specific to one entity whereas in actuality the great design of experience is much the same for each entity. It is with this in mind that we would discuss the experiential forces which offered catalyst to an individual.

35.5 Thank you. That is an important example I believe. I was wondering if any of those who were subordinate to Adolf at that time were able to polarize in a harvestable nature on the negative path?

Ra: I am Ra. We can speak only of two entities who may be harvestable in a negative sense, others still being in the physical incarnation: one known to you as Hermann; the other known, as it preferred to be called, Himmler.

Harvestable in this sentence does not refer to the present tense as Ra has warned in his first response. Ra is saying that 'harvestable' will be taken out of context. Which it has..as is often argued. So those that are interested in transitory and misleading material interpret the question incorrectly. Ra is using known entities as examples, not as fact. Ra wasn't saying Goering and Himmler are waiting to be harvested.."there is the possibility that information may be seen to be specific to one entity whereas in actuality the great design of experience is much the same for each entity."

ra is not saying 'harvestable' will be taken out of context. you promptly made it up again.

.....................

edit : how can you possibly interpret the below as 'ra says these will be taken out of context in regard to harvest' ?

""there is the possibility that information may be seen to be specific to one entity whereas in actuality the great design of experience is much the same for each entity.""

it basically says these information regarding specific entities may be taken as specific to one entity, whereas the great design of experience is much the same for each entity ?

huh ?

here again :

"It is to be noted that in discussing those who are well-known among your peoples there is the possibility that information may be seen to be specific to one entity whereas in actuality the great design of experience is much the same for each entity."

let me translate into street speak :

[b]when talking about well known people, it is possible that you may think these information are specific to those people, BUT actually the grand design of experience is the same for any person.



i dont see any point in talking these with you. if need be, you will come up and say Ra saying 'i am Ra' totally invalidates whatever you dont like to see. i will have to politely excuse myself from discussing anything with you.

edit : but before explain to me how you are able to 'interpret' that sentence, as 'ra says people will take this information regarding 'harvest''.

---

http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/simulation/realtime/

was in red range just a little while ago. now even in its rather lower state, its at green minimum.

first cmes of the last wave reached earth.