09-24-2011, 02:50 AM
(09-23-2011, 08:12 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Experimental error, most likely. For example, bad calculation of distance.
What makes error the most likely explanation? Scientific breakthroughs are happening all the time. Nearly a day goes by that I don't read an article that overturns previous dogma. So why not the speed of light? Kind of sounds fitting for the times.
Obviously, such a result needs to be confirmed and reconfirmed, though I will give the folks at the CERN the benefit of the doubt for now. Time will prove these findings to be true or false.
If true, then time will have proven itself to be nothing more than a projection of the mind. Sounds like the perfect paradox to herald a new age.