10-08-2011, 08:40 PM
(10-08-2011, 08:02 PM)zenmaster Wrote:Okay.(10-08-2011, 07:41 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: lol. or is it simply your projection?Individuation is a process, but you were treating it as some example of an end, and through such an idea showing how your circle dynamic worked in such an illusory manner. It's almost as if you are still trying to find excuses to legitimize your circle idea by recontextualizing the process of development to suit that purpose. That's objectionable.
(10-08-2011, 08:02 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Jung explicitly related the fact that individuation was not an end, and yet you chose to relate it that way. Is that not willful ignorance?
The Jung quote you gave states my perspective clearly. I don't understand what you are objecting, and, until now, I did not know you found me objectionable.
An end? An end to what?
I'm only pointing out that, in the full scheme of things, "individuation" is the exact equivalent to "nah nee nah nee boo boo, stick your head in doo doo". It comes from the same place. It is the same thing. It doesn't diminish the idea, but it also doesn't elevate itself past playground shenanigans. We are just humans, changing our games for our own amusement.
All the "objectionable" stuff is just something you might want to come to terms with. Or not. Free will.