Caring/Compassion/Sensitivity/Tact vs Lying/Faking

[Monica]

then its ok to ignore compassion and sto if you are in a position to give authoritative information ?

That's not what I said.

still, they kept on telling questioner that he was wrong, bluntly answered 'no' at times, and some more.

Of course. If I am teaching 1st graders how to add 2+2 and they say "5" of course I will tell them they are wrong, because I am teaching a very specific thing, and I am the designated teacher.

Ra was the designated teacher.

No one member in this community is a designated teacher of others.

so if you are teacher, its ok to waive compassion and not act in a sto manner as defined, towards your students ?

That's a stretch. But the question is irrelevant, since no one here is a designated teacher.

not only being students does not justify manipulative faking of communication and emotion, but also being teachers does not allow violation of something that is defined to be an universal guideline.

its hypocrisy.

Being considerate, and choosing words that convey a point more gently rather than harshly, isn't manipulative faking.

Ra did indeed display compassion, by always showing concern for Carla's wellbeing. There was no hypocrisy.

Don had a scientific mind and approach. Ra's demeanor seemed appropriate, given Don's approach. This supports my position, that a compassionate entity will adjust their approach according to the disposition of the other-self s/he is dealing with.

Ra's objective was to disseminate the Law of One information. The objective could not have been met with, say, a fundamentalist Christian preacher. Ra's approach fit the task.

You seem to be advocating the patterning after Ra, in every situation, regardless of the entities you're dealing with. It is, in my opinion, presumptuous to assume that Ra would have used the same demeanor in every situation, with every entity.