(11-02-2011, 10:30 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote:(11-02-2011, 09:40 PM)zenmaster Wrote: There is no difference between "instant" and "gradual" if "instant" is indefinitely projected into the future. It's perpetual incipience of the "event" unfolding according to hyper-intuitive notions of transcendence or pareidolia of current events matching expectations of awakening-to-higher-vibrational behavior. Framing, which by now, over 30 years, is becoming trite and shallow.
The "way out" of being held down to a date or even a date range has been, and will continue to be, re-interpretation of the material and hand-waving of subjective feelings and subjective correlations of external events as important signs of imminence (of course always more important than the 'event' itself, due to the ego-bound, unconscious complexes involved).
Perhaps the terms "instant" and "gradual" do not fully express the opposing schools of thought I was trying to define. "Instant" being described as a noticeable event which will impact our lifetimes in a very real way.
In addition to not being able to define "instant", connotations for "noticeable" and "very real" are also relegated to purely subjective and selective (ephemeral) notions.
(11-02-2011, 10:30 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote: "Gradual" being described as a seamless change, perhaps only barely noticeable or not at all, to the degree where when the event is complete, there is no difference from one day to the next, yet a noticeable difference in a larger amount of time.
I don't understand either of these "options". If, when one dies during harvest, they qualify for the next vibration, they get a new core vibration. If the transition to the higher vibration is hundreds of years, then they (now, what Ra calls part of the "new breed") probably have only partial use of the abilities afforded to that higher vibration.