(11-02-2011, 11:01 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote: I quite understand what you're saying. But I always imagined the "instant" harvest picture painted by Unity (and others) to be an inescapable event in which none would question the actual existence and passing of such event.Death is an inescapable event which none would question the actual existence and passing of such an event.
(11-02-2011, 11:01 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote:OK, yes this has been brought up numerous times. The latter would be more parsimonious due to the need to continue the propagation of these genetic vessels for our consciousness.Quote:(11-02-2011, 10:30 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote: "Gradual" being described as a seamless change, perhaps only barely noticeable or not at all, to the degree where when the event is complete, there is no difference from one day to the next, yet a noticeable difference in a larger amount of time.
I don't understand either of these "options". If, when one dies during harvest, they qualify for the next vibration, they get a new core vibration. If the transition to the higher vibration is hundreds of years, then they (now, what Ra calls part of the "new breed") probably have only partial use of the abilities afforded to that higher vibration.
I think from that perspective, the main difference would be whether we are forced into "death" from some outside mechanic of harvest, or whether we harvested upon natural death.
In my view, the "new breed" (dual-activated), mentioned by Ra, is much more of an upcoming thing as far as being a more overt presence.
(11-02-2011, 04:50 PM)knaumov Wrote: People, stop theorizing stuff. Really. Be here in the now and help it. We need to be of service & value to the process. Gaia and the collective urgently need help from within!Now you're being selectively hypocritical. Take a look at all your posts in the Elenin thread.
http://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.ph...4#pid52274