Is all the talk of "activation" just bullshit to get you to look outside yourself?

[native]

They offered information to all who had the ears/eyes for it, unconditionally.

I agree that ideally another system could be worked out. It's hard to do.

For the sake of being argumentative and applying standards equally, what about Bashar? You seem to be a fan of his, yet he charges for many things. I find his information to be generic.

I just think it's worth mentioning that in one hand because Bashar resonates with you, it seems that you are less critical, yet when it comes to Inelia (less resonance), issues arise.

So the question becomes, when should we be critical and why? Is the better approach to simply take it all with a grain of salt, rather than separating into 'good' and 'bad'?

As I see it, Inelia could be genuine. During this transitional period, it's possible such methods are used to incarnate those types of beings. Jesus was an aware wanderer, yet he basically spoke from the perspective that he came directly from the source..which is what Inelia is saying. I'm not equating Inelia with Jesus ..just throwing some analytical thinking out there. It's possible she's just a highly aware wanderer, and is being restricted from knowing her past, or simply chooses to avoid that label by preaching oneness. It's too early to tell with her.