11-16-2011, 01:32 PM
(11-16-2011, 01:19 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote:(11-16-2011, 12:43 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:(11-16-2011, 12:38 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote: Perhaps you're right, though I cannot wrap my head around the idea that someone would prefer that their meat suffer.
Perhaps you're right as well, though I cannot wrap my head around why somebody would be so concerned about the suffering of animals, meanwhile helpless children get beaten, raped, abducted, and murdered on a daily basis.
Just saying...
So you're saying that, because children suffer, we should not be concerned about our choices which lead to the suffering of animals?
I whole-heartedly disagree.
Let's say that a company makes money from the beating, raping, abducting, and murdering of children. Would you still support that company? Would it be inappropriate to worry about what that company does because someone else is doing it anyways? Would not supporting that company and supporting them be the same because there is still suffering elsewhere in the world?
By your definition of "support", I'm certain we all do "support" those things with our purchases.