"Thrive" is amazing must watch!

[zenmaster]

The idea of something then becomes infinitely more important than what the idea might ever provide if examined. Not just important, even sacred . Look at the defensive attitude when discernment is applied to certain symbolic elements which may be unconsciously activated by some entertainment, when that entertainment merely ambiguously refers to them.

As far as free energy goes, I have to wonder if there is any decision making on the part of the Confederation taking place.

Of course there is decision making going on with regards to any technology which has the power to support/destroy evolution here.

For instance, if someone in the public sector is making advancements, I wonder if the government is advised to put a lid on it because there are too many unaddressed issues at the moment. Considering our karmic history, it's not totally unreasonable. They certainly wouldn't endorse murder, so I imagine those types of occurrences are negatively motivated.

I would not doubt it. But it would seem they'd require unconventional aid in order to effectively put a lid on it, which would seem to constitute free-will abridgement.

If free energy really was the answer, then why hasn't positive influence overcome the negative? Is it relative to the overall bias of the peoples?

It is relative to the overall bias of the peoples - that's how "our own" ideas emerge to our consciousness - a shared "experiential nexus" - wanderer, transplant, and native alike. Any one individual can make a difference in possibility for perception, and that includes inklings of how intelligent energy may serve the population. There are also practical/mechanical aspects of the research that have little to do with polarity so much as insight, experience, skill, etc.

Even though the planet is considered positive, the majority has yet to polarize. As strange as it sounds, it seems that the majority are content with the choices they've made so far.

Creating viable "free energy" requires an understanding which goes well beyond that which is necessary for many types of learning and polarizing here. We are given precisely those problems to address which deal with the distortions we intend to alleviate. If these lessons are related to survival concerns, or real or imagined, then I believe there is less potential to experience the higher freedoms such as may be afforded by a new system of energy. There's a tacit social agreement which supports such focused learning.