11-27-2011, 01:09 PM
(11-27-2011, 08:08 AM)Namaste Wrote: Invalidating the sharing of that part of the developmental process is rather limiting mindset, in my opinion, as it can in turn start a chain reaction of inspiration and development.I know you think you understand my position, but you really don't. I understand inspiration and the general motivational power of positive thinking. I've constantly been stating that everything starts with intuitive perception.
However, when actual science or history is 'hijacked', or things are overextended beyond what they are capable of supporting, for the purpose of influence under the guise of 'anything is possible if I like the idea' - that's simply at best 'entertainment'. I personally think it's wrong because you are actually claiming something which is currently untrue, more for the purpose of convincing than inspiring. I guess it's a subtlety that many people miss - the possibility is not phrased as a question, but framed as an established fact. A mere 'what if' is grossly distorted to 'this is the case, here is the situation, if only we were not denied more knowledge of *this fabricated* paradigm which we are depicting'. If you throw away rationality to support possibility, you are swimming in the pre-conventional, instinctual realm of numinosity which is quite unconscious and impotent for the purpose of transformation.