In regards to eating meat

[Monica]

Sure ya do! MBSC would be an example, as well as Father/Son/Spirit. Or Maiden/Mother/Crone. Or Yin/Yang/Dao. Id/Ego/Superego. Proton/Neutron/Electron. Love/Light/Consciousness. Take your pick.

Ah, yes I am familiar with all of those (though I wouldn't consider Yin/Yang/Tao to be a trinity).

We see many things in 2's and 3's because that is the numerology we are the most familiar with, dwelling in 3D. But I think of the Universe as infinite, with an infinite number of distortions. So for every category of 3's, there are also 4's, 5's, and so on.

But in all seriousness- there is polarity (or duality) and then the third point of unity which "binds all things". As Ra says, the distortion is not in any case necessary.

Why stop at 2 or 3? I don't see unity as the 3rd point. Unity is beyond any distortion whatsoever.

I'm out of time, Tenet. This isn't a cop-out. I'd like to respond to the rest of your points, but won't be able to for awhile. I've got a very busy week ahead of me.

For now, I will just say that yes, of course I remember that you questioned the infallibility of the Ra sessions. I'm simply pointing out that any statement, whether from Ra or Q'uo, is subject to both distortion and interpretation. Thus, a statement that might seem 'clear' to Person A might not be so to Person B.

More later...Thanks for the stimulating and respectful discussion!

---

Are you suggesting there should be laws against eating meat? Because you keep equating this to murder.

Yikes!!! I need to reply to this. I have never equated eating animals to the murder of humans. Never.

In fact, I have gone to great lengths to draw a clear distinction.

To hear you say that I "keep equating it to murder" is very disturbing, being that I have stated the opposite so many times.

In this particular case, we weren't even talking about eating meat. We were talking about the need for laws. So I gave an example about how laws are still needed, because people still engage in that activity. Once people no longer engage in that activity, there is no longer a need for a law prohibiting it. The conversation at this point had nothing whatever to do with eating meat!

Maybe I need to put a disclaimer in my sig...