(11-30-2011, 01:15 AM)zenmaster Wrote: I've seen it demo'd before and this looks like the more of the same. I don't see anything special? Is there supposed to be an implication there?
Correct me if I'm mistaken, but I was under the impression these generated energy due to the implementation of the torus shape.
(11-30-2011, 01:25 AM)zenmaster Wrote:(11-30-2011, 01:18 AM)Conifer16 Wrote: Zen how do you know it is BS?Because 'it' is never defined. There is a certain treatment of an idea (as a claim) that may serve as a basis for validation, and that was not provided although it was indeed purposefully suggested. That's "BS" or "hearsay". Has nothing to do with being "omniscient" (lol).
Knowing the 'truth' is limited by your own experiences and current level of understanding.
For example, the ex CEO of Skunk Works (Lookheed Martin) would tell you -if he were still alive- that free energy is indeed already a reality, a truth.
For one to label something 'untrue' directly implies you know everything. It's inherent in the statement. Perhaps the term which would suit better is 'not discovered or understood in my personal experience'.
Labeling something 'untrue' is an attempt to be objective in a subjective universe.