(11-30-2011, 01:35 AM)Conifer16 Wrote: I can try and explain what I mean if you want.Explain away.
(11-30-2011, 06:36 AM)Namaste Wrote:(11-30-2011, 01:15 AM)zenmaster Wrote: I've seen it demo'd before and this looks like the more of the same. I don't see anything special? Is there supposed to be an implication there?
Correct me if I'm mistaken, but I was under the impression these generated energy due to the implementation of the torus shape.
No. They create turn electricity into a magnetic field. They do not generate energy, that's already coming out of the electrical socket.
(11-30-2011, 06:36 AM)Namaste Wrote:Why yes it is, of course.(11-30-2011, 01:25 AM)zenmaster Wrote:(11-30-2011, 01:18 AM)Conifer16 Wrote: Zen how do you know it is BS?Because 'it' is never defined. There is a certain treatment of an idea (as a claim) that may serve as a basis for validation, and that was not provided although it was indeed purposefully suggested. That's "BS" or "hearsay". Has nothing to do with being "omniscient" (lol).
Knowing the 'truth' is limited by your own experiences and current level of understanding.
(11-30-2011, 06:36 AM)Namaste Wrote: For one to label something 'untrue' directly implies you know everything.They claim the toroid device is providing free energy, when it is not. One doesn't need to "know everything" in order to point out the obvious - that they're not providing some workable free-energy device or free-energy principle. We're not "blinded" by being ignorant of the toroid.
A magnetic field is a toroid shape. Big deal.
(11-29-2011, 01:44 AM)SomaticDreams Wrote: Have you ever read any studies on Gestalt Psychology or read any work by Michael Polayani, Zenmaster?I've talked to someone that attended some Gestalt Psychology workshops. Seemed to be of great therapeutic help.
Have not read Polayani. Why?